Robins Company, had been driven into bankruptcy under the weight of several hundred thousand lawsuits, and other IUD manufacturers, fearing further litigation, had withdrawn from the U.S.
By the mid-1980s, the Shield's manufacturer, the A.H.
Copper iud series#
For a decade, the media trumpeted a series of studies linking the Shield and other IUDs to pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) and subsequent infertility. By mid-1974, after a spate of deaths from septic miscarriages, the manufacturer had suspended sales in the United States and soon thereafter, worldwide. In 1973, however, congressional hearings highlighted serious health problems with the Dalkon Shield, a new, heavily marketed, plastic IUD that had quickly become the most popular model in the country. women practicing contraception were relying on the IUD. Based on a concept that has been around for centuries, the modern IUD-a small, plastic or metal device inserted into the uterus that provides extended protection against pregnancy, primarily by interfering with sperm and eggs-was lauded as an easier-to-use alternative to the pill. In the mid-1960s, another method was introduced to Americans with similar fanfare but has been ultimately far less successful: the intrauterine device, known more commonly by its acronym, the IUD. Over the decades, a stream of subtle innovations to the method have made it safer and proven to provide a variety of additional health benefits, from fighting acne to preventing ovarian cancer.
The oral contraceptive-introduced in 1960 and quickly dubbed, simply, “the pill”-was a remarkable and lasting success. The 1960s introduced to Americans two promising new ways to prevent an unplanned pregnancy. Donate Now First published online: November 8, 2007
0 kommentar(er)
